Feed items

Koch Brothers Provide Significant Funding to Top Two Primary (Measure 90) Supporters

Oregon Progressive Party Press Release: 9/16/2014

The Koch brothers, through their firm Koch Industries, are providing significant funding to a major supporter of Measure 90, the top two primary proposal.

The political committee of Associated Oregon Industries (AOI PAC, ID #10) reported on September 3 receiving a $10,000 contribution from Koch Industries.  The AOI PAC on September 2 reported giving a $50,000 contribution to Vote Yes on Measure 90 (ID #17001), making it at that time the largest financial backer of the measure.  It was later topped by the $60,000 contribution from the Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Administrators.

Koch Industries, at $25,000, is the third largest aggregate contributor to the AOI PAC, behind only Daimler Trucks LLC and ESCO Corp.

"The Koch brothers join a parade of corporations, corporate executives, and big-time financiers in bankrolling Measure 90," said Seth Woolley of the Pacific Green Party.  "They correctly perceive Measure 90 as a way for the corporations to control Oregon."

The largest contributors to the Yes on Measure 90 PAC are:

Lessons Not Learned

 

We are Very xxx Different from the Establishment Parties

 

Democratic

Republican

Progressive

Real campaign finance reform, particularly in Oregon

NO

NO

YES

"Medicare for All" comprehensive health care

NO

NO

YES

Oppose cuts in Social Security & Medicare benefits

NO

NO

YES

Increase minimum wages to living wage ($15 or more)

NO

NO

YES

Employment for All (public works projects, WPA style)

NO

NO

YES

Increase income taxes on big corporations and the wealthy

NO

NO

YES

Oppose Wall Street bailouts

NO

NO

YES

Repair, improve infrastructure (transportation, water systems, etc.)

NO

NO

YES

Oppose NAFTA, WTO, Trans-Pacific Partnership "free trade" deals; support local products & services

NO

NO

YES

Oppose war in Iraq, Afghanistan; bring troops home now and stop sending in more

NO

NO

YES

Slash military spending and foreign bases

NO

NO

YES

End occupation of Palestine

NO

NO

YES

Oppose spying on Americans, including drones

NO

NO

YES

Equal rights for all; same-sex marriage

???

NO

YES

Clean energy; no nuclear subsidies

NO

NO

YES

Oppose shipping coal or oil for export from Pacific Northwest ports

NO

NO

YES

Oppose offshore oil & gas drilling

NO

NO

YES

Legalize marijuana possession and use

???

NO

YES

End “corporate personhood” and constitutional rights for corporations

NO

NO

YES

Require labeling of genetically engineered food

NO

NO

YES

End the U.S. Senate filibuster; restore majority rule

NO

NO

YES

 

OREGON ISSUES

1.     We have worked for real campaign finance reform. Oregon Democrats and Republicans have never enacted limits on political campaign contributions but have repealed voter-enacted limits 3 times. Democrats in state office are refusing to enforce the campaign finance reform Measure 47 enacted by Oregon voters in 2006. Campaign spending for Oregon state offices has skyrocketed from $4 million in 1996 to $57 million in 2010. Spending by candidates for Oregon Legislature increased another 13% in 2012. Winning a contested race for the Legislature now typically costs over $600,000, sometimes over $1 million.  

2.     The initiative and referendum should be available to grass-roots efforts. The Democrat Secretary of State is now discarding over 30% of all voter signatures on initiative petitions due to arbitrary, hyper-technical, and unnecessary rules, raising the cost of petition drives so high that only corporations, unions and the very wealthy can afford to use it.  

3.     The State Treasurer should direct part of Oregon's $87 billion of investment funds to invest in local public works and jobs for Oregonians instead of vulture capitalists, corporate raiders, leveraged buyout artists, and fossil fuel corporations and vendors.  

4.     We want fair taxation. Oregon has the 4th highest income taxes of any state on lower-income working families and is still at the bottom in taxes on corporations.  

5.     We want to stop government promotion of gambling, including video poker, video slots, and approval of private casinos.  

6.     We oppose installation of police "spy cameras" and use of drones to spy on Oregon citizens.  

7.     We oppose using public money to subsidize rail transport of oil or coal through Oregon communities.

 

 

The Udall Resolution to Amend U.S. Constitution is Inadequate

On September 11, the U.S. Senate voted 54-42 to break the filibuster on the resolution to send to the States a proposed constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United.  The Democrats all voted to break the filibuster but did not invoke the "nuclear option" that would allow that 54-42 vote to prevail.  Instead, the Democrats allowed the Republicans to "win" with only 42 votes, thereby blocking a vote on the resolution itself.  Thanks, Democrats.  Of course, since such a resolution requires 2/3 affirmative votes in both houses of Congress, it would not be adopted by the current Congress.

The piece below shows that the resolution left much to be desired, anyway.

-- Dan Meek

As the US Senate moves to vote on the Udall proposed constitutional amendment to address the effects of the US Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, let's be clear.

by David Delk

We need a single constitutional amendment that says:
*Corporations are not people and do not have constitutional rights, and
*
money is not speech, it is property and shall be subject to regulation at all levels of government.
 
From the sounds of the letters received as well as the emails, our democracy can only be saved from the plutocrats and corporatists if we sign the petitions and contribute some money to endorse passage of Senate Joint Resolution 19, the so-called Udall amendment. According to the letter dated August 13, 2014, from Public Citizen, “Senators Cantwell and McCaskill just announced that they will vote for our constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United, McCutcheon and all the other disastrous Supreme Court decisions that are handing effective control of our democracy over to giant corporations and a tiny cabal of super-wealthy individuals.”
 
We agree with Public Citizen that this is a crucial time for our democracy and that urgent action is required. But is Senator Tom Udall's (D-NM) Amendment (SRJ19) the right amendment? Will it do what it is hyped to do?
 
Oregon Progressive Party says “Get some teeth in that”
 
We need a proposed constitutional amendment with some teeth, something that will really do what Public Citizen suggests the Udall Amendment will do, but actually would not.

Bylaws of Oregon Progressive Party

Vote No on Measure 90: Destroys Minor Parties

Here is the joint Voters' Pamphlet statement of Oregon Progressive Party and Pacific Green Party:

Oregon’s Grassroots Political Parties Say “Vote NO” on Measure 90: “Top Two Primary”

The big business backers of Measure 90 want to restrict your right to vote for the candidates and political parties of your choice. They want only Democrats and Republicans on the November ballot.

Measure 90 will allow only two candidates on the November ballot in each race. Both candidates can be from the same party.

 Under “Top Two” in Washington and California, there have been:
ZERO minor party or independent candidates
on the general election ballot for
any statewide office

and

ZERO minor party candidates for any office,
including the Legislature, when two major party candidates
ran in the primary election.

Washington elects 147 legislators and 12 Congress members; California elects 120 legislators and 55 Congress members. In November, voters in those states could vote for only Democrats and Republicans in races where at least 2 of them ran in the primary. In California there will be 28 races this November between 2 Democrats or between 2 Republicans.

In practice, “Top Two” means just Democrats and Republicans, period.

The impartial Oregon Citizens’ Review Committee voted 14-5 to oppose Measure 90, in part because:

“Measure 90 has several drafting errors. The most significant appears to eliminate minor parties. Because M90 bars parties from nominating candidates, their legal status is in jeopardy.”

Measure 90 backers claim it will increase voter turnout and produce “moderate” legislatures. But, under Top Two, California and Washington just suffered the lowest voter turnout primaries in their histories. A 2014 study by professors at Princeton and Georgetown ranked the California and Washington legislatures #1 and #4 in most polarization among the 50 states. Oregon ranked #18.

Oregon has a long and proud history of grassroots political parties and independent voices. Voters need real, meaningful choices on the November ballot. That’s why we’re urging NO on Measure 90.

VISIT SAVEOREGONSDEMOCRACY.ORG

Oregon Progressive Party     progparty.org
Pacific Green Party of Oregon     pacificgreens.org

Party Endorses Some Oregon Ballot Measures, Opposes Others

The Oregon Progressive Party has endorsed these measures on the 2014 Oregon general election ballot:

Measure 88 (referendum): Provides Oregon resident "driver card" without requiring proof of legal presence in the United States.

Measure 89 (initiative): Amends Constitution: State/political subdivision shall not deny or abridge equality of rights on account of sex.

Measure 91 (initiative): Allows possession, manufacture, sale of marijuana by/to adults, subject to state licensing, regulation, taxation.

Measure 92 (initiative): Requires food manufacturers, retailers to label "genetically engineered" foods as such; state, citizens may enforce.

The Oregon Progressive Party opposes these measures on the 2014 Oregon general election ballot:

Measure 90 (initiative): Changes general election nomination processes: provides for single primary ballot listing candidates; top two advance.

Party Elects New State Council

The Oregon Progressive Party has elected a new 5-person State Council, which is generally in charge of all party matters. The new council members are:

Alaina Melville
David Delk
David Hess
Jason Kafoury
Liz Trojan

State Council Candidates: Short Biographies

Below is biographical information about the State Council candidates, in alphabetical order.
 

Don Baham

Don Baham is a progressive populist activist and originator of Conversations with Dr. Don, a weekly news interview program.  Don writes:

I was born in New Orleans, LA of red, white, and black Roman Catholic parentage on December 26, 1928.

Today, I am a-religious and accepting of all others.I am a retired PhD Clinical Psychologist and present-day television broadcast journalist.

 
I am the 12th of 12 children, am married, and am the father of 5 daughters by a first marriage.
 
Politically, I am a progressive populist activist still learning how to live lovingly.
 
A few of my heroes include Jesus, Ghandi, MLK, and any other fellow human being who is currently living lovingly.
 

David Delk

David Delk has been the President of the Alliance for Democracy for the past 12 years. Four years ago, he established a public cable access program called the Populist Dialogues. He is a native Portlander who also is President of the Eastside democratic Club, heads up the Move to Amend efforts in Portland, is a founder of Oregonians for Renewable EnergyPolicy (advocates for a feed in tariff), and also a founder of Oregon Democracy Coalition.  In 2006 he was a chief petitioner for Measure 46, which would have amended the Oregon constitution to allow limitations on campaign contributions and expenditures.  He is also the co-chair of the Global Justice Committee of Jobs with Justice, working with the Oregon Fair Trade Campaign to promote fair trade policies and to oppose global multi-national "free" trade agreements like the currently being negotiated Trans Pacific Partnership and the Trans Atlantic (European-US) Free Trade Agreement.  In his spare time, he is a member of the First Unitarian Church and its Economic Justice Action Group, and he likes working in his garden, organically.

Barbara G. Ellis

Barbara G. Ellis, Ph.D., is a member of 350.org’s divestment project, was active in Occupy's Labor Solidarity Committee, a life-long political activist, and a contributor to both London’s Carbon Tracker Initiative, and the TruthOut website. She also is a long-time journalist (LIFE magazine; Washington, DC. Evening Star; the Beirut Daily Star, the International Medical News Group). For several years, she was a journalism professor (Oregon State University, Louisiana’s McNeese State University). She’s written several books and was a nominee for the 2004 Pulitzer Prize in history (“The Moving Appeal”), and, now, is a principal of a Portland OR writing/PR firm.
 

David Hess

David Hess was one of the first five members of the Oregon Progressive Party (formerly the Peace Party) and has served on its Nominating Caucus from its inception.

He has also served as Treasurer of the Oregon Progressive Party for 3 years, a job that includes reporting all contributions and expenditures to the Oregon campaign finance reporting system.

He has worked as a paralegal at the law firm of Kafoury & McDougal since 2005.

He actively participates in anti-war and anti-surveillance protests and has been a key organizer for Oregon Progressive Party events since 2008.
 

Jason Kafoury

Jason Kafoury is an attorney at Kafoury & McDougal law firm, where he represents victims of corporations and insurance companies.  Prior to joining the firm 5 years ago, he worked for Ralph Nader for 5 years.  He was the national coordinator of the Nader for President 2008 campaign, putting Nader on the ballot  in 45 states (and DC) by collecting voter signatures and conducting voter conventions (and arranging write-in status in 4 other states, as Oklahoma bans write-ins).  His coordination also created new minor parties in Connecticut, Maryland, New Mexico, and Hawaii, and Nader's general election vote totals preserved the existence of other minor parties in California, Delaware, and Florida. Jason helped found the Peace Party of Oregon in 2008, which nominated Nader for the Oregon ballot and in 2010 changed its name to the Oregon Progressive Party.  He has been a leader of the Party since he moved back to Portland in December 2008.
 

Liz Trojan

Liz Trojan was one of the original founders of the Peace Party of Oregon in 2008, which changed its name in 2010 to the Oregon Progressive Party (OPP).  She has served on the party's Nominating Caucus since 2008. Liz writes:

My political experience includes active involvement in a number of ballot initiatives. In the campaign finance reform and people's utility district initiatives, I was one of the chief petitioners. In addition to ballot initiatives, third parties are a powerful means to influence our government. I have been involved with the Oregon Progressive Party since it's inception. For me, the Oregon Progressive Party represents a way to push forward an agenda that puts people and communities first. As a State Council member for the party, I intend to be present at all the monthly meetings and to help with table opportunities whenever possible. The Oregon Progressive Party needs more visibility. Tabling is a great way to gain some visibility and have one on one conversations with interested individuals.

Dan Meek Debates Top Two Primary on KATU