- HOME
- Email Signup
- Issues
- Progressive Party Positions Table
- Iraq & Syria
- Progressive Party 2014 Voter Pamphlet Statement
- Cease negotiations of TPP
- Ferguson & Inequality
- Police Body Cameras
- 28th Amendment to U.S. Constitution
- Health Care
- Essays
- End Political Repression
- Joint Terrorism Task Force
- Pembina Propane Export Terminal
- Trans-Pacific Partnership
- Progressive Platform
- Register to Vote
- Calendar
- Candidates
- Forums
- Press Coverage
- Contribute
- About OPP
- Flyers, Buttons, Posters, Videos
- Actions
Feed items
Contribute to Oregon Progressive Party
Submitted by info on Tue, 11/04/2014 - 04:10
Oregon Progressive Party depends on contributions to fund our activities. Remember that, if you pay virtually anything in Oregon income taxes, you may give up to $50 and get it all back (every dollar) as a state income tax credit. A couple filing a joint return can give $100 and get it all back. See more information below.
Contribute by Check
You can send a check to:
Oregon Progressive Party
411 S.W. Second Avenue, Ste 200
Portland, OR 97204
Please make sure that your check includes your address. If you are contributing more than $100 in a calendar year, write your occupation, employer, and employer's city and state (see Required Information below) on the comment line on your check (usually in the lower left corner). If you wish to be contacted in the future by email, also write your email address on the check.
Contribute by Credit Card, Debit Card, or PayPal
Required Information:: Oregon law requires that we obtain your name. Anonymous contributions must be donated to charity. If you contribute more than $100 in a calendar year to us, we must also obtain your (1) address and (2) occupation. The law defines "occupation" as:
- The nature of an individual's principal business; and
- If the individual is employed by another person, the business name and address, by city and state, of the employer.
According to the Secretary of State, you are "not employed" if you are a student, retired, a volunteer, or a "homemaker." These folks should write "not employed" on the line for occupational information. Here is more information on what are considered acceptable "occupations." If you are self-employed, then your employer is "self."
Oregon Political Tax Credit: If you are an individual with taxable income of $1,000 or more, you may give up to $50 to political campaigns and get it all back (every dollar) as a state income tax credit. A couple filing a joint return can give $100 and get it all back, if your taxable income is at least $2,000. Those with lower incomes can get back amounts contributed, up to their total state income tax withheld or otherwise paid. Here is official government information about the: Oregon Political Tax Credit.It has not been updated since 2007 but is still accurate.
Oregon Progressive Party Statement on Health Care
Submitted by info on Tue, 11/04/2014 - 03:25
Our health care system is broken. We pay more for health care than any other industrialized nation, but we cover the smallest percentage of people. Under the Affordable Care Act, many Americans remain without access to health care. For lack of health insurance, thousands of Americans die each year. For those who do have health insurance, large co-pays and deductibles send many into debt. And it's the taxpayer who picks up the tab for the subsidized plans. The Affordable Care Act is less than a band-aid. It is a giveaway to the insurance companies.
Imagine if health care were a human right. Imagine a health care system that puts people before profits. Imagine if everyone had access to health care. Imagine health care that doesn't push people into bankruptcy. Imagine doctors and patients making health care decisions, not insurance companies. Imagine health care including dental, optical, and mental health care for all.
The Oregon Progressive Party supports local and federal efforts to create universal access to health care. Everyone in, no one out. We need health care, not health insurance.
"Of all the forms of inequity, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane."
--Martin Luther King Jr., 1966
We support the efforts of these organizations:
Health Care For All Oregon - hcao.org
Mad As Hell Doctors - MadAsHellDoctors.com
Simgle Payer Action - SinglePayerAction.org
Healthcare Now! - healthcare-now.org
Physicians for a National Health Program - pnhp.org
- info's blog
- Login to post comments
OPP calls for 28th Constitutional Amendment: Corporations are not people and money is not speech
Submitted by DavidDelk on Tue, 10/28/2014 - 22:00
Party Issues Statement on Body Cameras for Policy
Submitted by info on Tue, 10/21/2014 - 17:02
The OPP has issued a Policy Statement on Police Body Cameras supporting required use of body cameras to record police interactions with civilians.
- info's blog
- Login to post comments
Oregon Progressive Party Policy Statement on Police Body Cameras
Submitted by info on Tue, 10/21/2014 - 15:29
Oregon Progressive Party Policy Statement on Police Body Cameras
-
The Oregon Progressive Party calls for all Oregon Police to be equipped with body cameras as soon as certain questions are addressed. We recommend that such questions be addressed during the 2014 Oregon legislative session.
- The Oregon Progressive Party calls on the Portland City Council to put body cameras on the Portland Police to prevent a systemic pattern of excessive force against citizens.
Police in Oregon should be required to use body video cameras to document police interactions with citizens. This will lead to safer police encounters for everyone involved. Recent Oregon jury awards and settlements for police excessive force have put this debate over the use of body cameras at the forefront, making this the perfect time to have a healthy discussion on this issue.
Police agencies around the country have started using body cameras with encouraging results. In Rialto, California, police officers have employed body cameras since February 2012. Since police body cameras have become mandatory, the number of complaints filed against officers dropped by 88% and use of force reports by officers dropped almost 60%. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan applauded the City of Rialto’s use of body cameras on police in her ruling that struck down New York’s "stop and frisk" policy. The New York City Police Department now plans to employ such cameras on some of their officers as a pilot program to gauge the effect on the number of complaints and use of force reports they write and receive.
With mounting scrutiny over police shootings and misconduct throughout the country, there is no question that body cameras should be mandatory on Oregon police officers, but practical questions remain about implementation and the risk of civil liberties violations. Some of the questions that need to be addressed before Oregon police can begin using body cameras are as follows:
- Will officers be allowed to turn their cameras on and off? If so, when and how?
- Where will the information and video content be stored?
- Who will have access to the content? And will officers or higher-ups be allowed to edit content?
- Will the public through public record requests be allowed to access content? And how transparent must the police be with allowing content to be accessed by the public?
- How much storage space will be needed to store all the content? And how secure will that information be in this day and age where hackers can access almost anything connected to the Internet?
- Oregon State law requires notification when police are recording people. How will that affect police interaction with citizens?
- How much will it cost to implement a mandatory body camera policy on all Oregon Police officers?
The Oregon Progressive Party calls on the Portland City Council to put body cameras on the Portland Police to prevent a systemic pattern of excessive force against citizens.
Federal Judge Michael Simon recently approved the City of Portland’s settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, which called for reforms of Portland Police policies, training and oversight. The settlement was reached after a federal investigation into excessive force used by Portland Police officers found a pattern of using excessive force against citizens who suffer from mental illness. In Judge Simon’s ruling, he stated his support for the use of body cameras on police officers but did not rule it mandatory.
Mayor Charlie Hales has publicly stated that he is in favor of putting body cameras on Portland Police officers. In an email to the Oregonian, Hales says:
"We've long been proponents of body cameras but the technology wasn't good enough and they were expensive. The Bureau piloted a variation of clip-on cameras for the Traffic Division this summer to see if they live up to expectations. We have heard that the officers who used them like them.”
The Portland City Council approved $800,000 for in-car video cameras, but Portland Police Sgt. Pete Simpson has since indicated that police are now considering using that money to put body cameras on the 600 uniformed Portland Police officers. The body cameras would include patrol, school police, gang enforcement and traffic officers.
Two of the City of Portland’s largest jury verdicts against the police for misconduct and excessive force have been rendered in the past two years. We as citizens are tired of police misconduct and excessive force, and these jury awards are a statement of this discontent. It’s clear that the time for body cameras is upon us, but we will need to work out the logistical challenges of implementation to make sure we protect our citizens' civil liberties.
- Login to post comments
Populist Dialogues Discusses Top Two Primary (Measure 90)
Submitted by info on Fri, 10/17/2014 - 00:06
- info's blog
- Login to post comments
Former Top Enron Energy Trader Funds 69% of Measure 90 Campaign (Top Two Primary)
Submitted by info on Thu, 10/09/2014 - 01:36
Manipulating energy markets was not enough
Now the agenda is manipulating Oregon's elections
Update: John Arnold has ponied up another $275,000, making his total Measure 90 contribution = $1.75 million.
Former top-level Enron energy trader John Arnold has now contributed $1,500,000 to a new political committee, the "Open Primaries Committee." Arnold doubled his previous $500,000 contribution two weeks before with another $1,000,000 contribution just filed today. The Committee's only mission is to support Measure 90, the "top two" primary plan backed by corporations and the wealthy.
John Arnold made his mark on society as one of the top managers of the Enron energy trading operation. That was the bunch who caused the phony "West Coast Energy Crisis" of 2000-2002 with fraudulent trades, resulting in rolling blackouts and huge electricity rate increases. Later studies showed that it cost the California economy alone over $42 billion. For its impact on Oregon, see Enron Corruption: The Special Oregon Connection.
John Arnold is Measure 90's biggest financial backer, by far. Of the total raised to support Measure 90 between its two committees ($2,189,719 so far), John Arnold personally has contributed 69% of it.
"Burn, baby, burn. That's a beautiful thing." That is what Enron traders were recorded as saying as a fire approached a major transmission line, because it caused the line to be "derated" or shut off, thus drastically increasing electricity prices. See this New York Times article: Word for Word? Energy Hogs: Enron Traders on Grandama Millie and Making Out Like Bandits for more information. Or remember this from the Enron energy traders:
"They're f------g taking all the money back from you guys?" complains an Enron employee on the tapes. "All the money you guys stole from those poor grandmothers in California?"
"Yeah, grandma Millie, man"
"Yeah, now she wants her f------g money back for all the power you've charged right up, jammed right up her ass for f------g $250 a megawatt hour." [emphasis added]
See the CBS News article Enron Traders Caught on Tape.
John Arnold received a $8 million bonus in 2001, one day before Enron declared bankruptcy. In his 2005 deposition, he took the 5th Amendment and refused to answer any questions, except basically his name. He formed a hedge fund, Centaurus Advisors LLC, and hired, among others, John Forney, who had pled guilty to manipulating electricity prices from Enron's now-defunct trading office in Portland, Oregon. See the CBS News piece Enron Energy Trader Pleads Guilty.
For more information on why Measure 90 is bad for Oregon (but somehow apparently good for former Enron energy traders) see:
OPP Candidate for Governor Debates Other Hopefuls
Submitted by info on Sun, 09/28/2014 - 01:42
A written description of this debate, conducted by the Oregon League of Cities, is available at KATU. Our candidates are shut out of most televised debates.
- info's blog
- Login to post comments
Statement on U.S. Military Intervention in Iraq and Syria
Submitted by info on Fri, 09/19/2014 - 16:18
The United States needs to:
Get out of Iraq.
Stay out of Syria.
Twelve years ago the Bush Administration and the corporate media launched a huge campaign to convince Americans that a regime in the Middle East was such a threat that it required military intervention and occupation of the area. "Sadam Hussein even gassed his own people," we were told, along with the falsehoods about weapons of mass destruction. The United States has already suffered nearly 4,500 Americans dead and 35,000 Americans injured, not to mention the effects on Iraqis: over 175,000 dead, untold numbers injured, displacement of over 1.5 million from their homes, the devastation of the Iraqi economy and infrastructure, and the leveling of Iraqi cities. It has cost over $2 trillion of U.S. taxpayer money.
Now the same hype job is back, to ensure continued profits of the military-industrial establishment. Now, again, there is a regime in the Middle East (ISIS) that is claimed to pose a threat to the entire world. "The brutal, insane ISIS regime has beheaded two American journalists! We must respond by sending our military back to Iraq!"
The Oregon Progressive Party says no. American policy should be:
Get out of Iraq.
Stay out of Syria.
The Obama Administration now says we have to do the same thing we already did in Iraq for over a decade. But this time somehow military intervention in Iraq (and Syria) will work, instead of just continuing to make the situation worse for the U.S. and for those who live in Iraq and Syria. Not to be outdone by the Bush folks, Obama wants to expand U.S. military strikes into Syria and to arm "the moderate Syrian opposition." The CIA has already been trying to do that, but the weapons seem to end up in the hands of ISIS.
And, say the hawks, we have to "train and equip the Iraqi Army," which we already did for 10 years--before they ripped off their uniforms and turned over their weapons to ISIS. And, although until about a week ago the two worst regimes in the Middle East were supposedly Iran and Syria, now the U.S. is allying itself with those Shiite regimes against their Sunni enemies.
The only reason the war hawks care about Iraq and adjacent areas is because somehow a lot of Arab sand got deposited on top of our oil. Protecting the oil there does not benefit consumers; it only secures more profits for the oil companies.
Get out of Iraq.
Stay out of Syria.